Casinos Outside BetStop in Australia — A Reader-First Read of the Rules
Data current as of 24 September 2026 and verified against the Australian Communications and Media Authority’s published register of formal warnings and blocking requests.

A short line before the long ones. BetStop — the National Self-Exclusion Register — covers licensed Australian wagering services. Online casino games and online pokies are not licensed anywhere in Australia, so BetStop does not cover them. An offshore casino is, by definition, outside the register. Anyone who has self-excluded through BetStop and is now searching for sites that BetStop cannot reach is searching for a way around their own decision. This page is written for two readers at once: the curious, who want to know what sits on the other side of the line, and the person who has just put themselves on a register and is wondering whether the register leaves a gap. Both deserve a plain answer before any list.
The Shortlist of Operators the ACMA Has Formally Warned
The eleven brands below are not ranked. They are not recommended. They are the brands the ACMA has itself named in a formal warning for offering prohibited interactive gambling services to people in Australia. Each is named, dated and placed against the same backdrop: no state or territory issues a licence for online casino games, so the licence any of these brands displays is a foreign one. Treat the set as a record of enforcement, not as a menu.

The table collects what each brand’s ACMA file actually says: which company was warned, when, and what supplementary sources turned up. The phrase “Subject support” uses an em dash where the consultative listings we drew on offered nothing usable for that brand. Where a brand appears across more than one warning, the table carries the most recent ACMA action and points back to the earlier one.
| Brand | ACMA action and date | Operator named by the ACMA | Subject support |
|---|---|---|---|
| RocketPlay | Formal warning, March 2026 | Pulsup Ltd | Listings-only |
| Level Up Casino | Formal warning, May 2022 | Dama N.V. | Listings-only |
| Woo Casino | Formal warning, March 2025 | Dama N.V. | — |
| Spirit Casino | Formal warning, May 2025 | Dama N.V. | — |
| National Casino | Formal warning, July 2025 | Consolutetish S.R.L. | Listings-only |
| Bizzo Casino | Formal warning, July 2025; earlier 2022 | Consolutetish S.R.L. | Listings-only |
| Ignition Casino | Formal warning, July 2025 | Bamboo Media | — |
| Instant Casino | Formal warning, February 2025 | EOD Code SRL | Listings-only |
| Jackbit | Formal warning, April 2026 | Ryker B.V. | — |
| Casino Intense | Formal warning, April 2025 | Sterplay Holding Ltd | Listings-only |
| Sky Crown | Formal warning, September 2022 | Hollycorn N.V. | — |
One company recurs. Dama N.V. has been on the receiving end of at least three formal warnings — over six brands in 2022 and two more in 2025. Consolutetish S.R.L. picked up two brands in a single July 2025 round. The same parent company running a fresh brand after the regulator has already named it is not, on this record, unusual.
RocketPlay
Pulsup Ltd received the most recent ACMA formal warning over RocketPlay in March 2026. The brand has been in the ACMA’s view before: Dama N.V. was named in the May 2022 round over a group of six brands that included RocketPlay. Two warnings, four years apart, with a change of operator on paper and the same product on the page. For a reader comparing operators, the pattern is the headline: a brand that has cycled through operators has cycled through the regulator’s interest too.

Level Up Casino
Dama N.V., May 2022. Level Up is one of the six brands named in that single ACMA round, alongside Bambet, Dazard, Rocketplay, Wild Tornado and Cobra Casinos. The operator is the same company the regulator returned to in 2025 over Woo Casino and Spirit Casino. A reader who treats the parent operator as background information is making a reasonable choice — it does not change the legal position — but the pattern of repeated warnings is what it is.
Woo Casino
Dama N.V., March 2025. The follow-up to the 2022 round. The brand itself is the news; the operator is the same one the ACMA had already warned in 2022.
Spirit Casino
Dama N.V., May 2025. The second 2025 action against Dama N.V. A reader treating Spirit as a fresh brand is reading against the ACMA file, which treats Spirit as the same operator acting again.
National Casino
Consolutetish S.R.L., July 2025. One of two Consolutetish brands named in the same month. Earlier, TechSolutions (CY) Group Limited and TechSolutions Group N.V. were warned in 2022 over a list of brands that included National Casino. The same brand, different parent, same regulator’s attention.
Bizzo Casino
Consolutetish S.R.L., July 2025; earlier TechSolutions, 2022. The 2022 warning is the one the ACMA has revisited; the 2025 warning is the regulator coming back at the brand under its current operator.
Ignition Casino
Bamboo Media, July 2025. The brand shares an operator with no other brand on this list — useful as a reminder that the parent-company repetition is not the whole story.
Instant Casino
EOD Code SRL, February 2025. The earliest 2025 action in the ACMA file. Useful as a baseline for how a brand looks when only one warning exists so far.
Jackbit
Ryker B.V., April 2026. The most recent of the 2026 entries. Read alongside RocketPlay, it shows the ACMA is still issuing fresh warnings this year, not closing files on older ones.
Casino Intense
Sterplay Holding Ltd, April 2025. A single warning, mid-2025. Useful as a mid-cycle data point — the ACMA’s attention was not confined to a handful of operators.
Sky Crown
Hollycorn N.V., September 2022. The oldest entry on the table and the one that anchors the rest: the 2022 round is what 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 keep returning to. The brand has not been rewarned in the data we drew on. Whether that means the warning worked, the brand changed hands, or the brand simply stopped marketing to Australians is not something the ACMA file settles.
What the Law Actually Says
Online casino games and online pokies cannot be licensed anywhere in Australia. That is the headline, and the headline is in the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 as tightened by the Interactive Gambling Amendment Act 2017. The Act makes it an offence to provide online casino games, online pokies or in-play betting to a person physically in Australia. The provider is the target; the individual player is not. What is licensable is wagering on races and sport placed before the event, lotteries and keno. In practice, that licensed wagering is administered through the Northern Territory — the Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission regulates 52 of Australia’s online bookmakers, including the major names, and the commission has no full-time staff and meets once a month in Darwin. The reader who has only ever met an Australian gambling licence at the betting slip has met the only licence there is.
The ACMA investigates, issues formal warnings and directs Australian internet service providers to block illegal sites. By June 2026, the ACMA had asked for 1,751 illegal gambling and affiliate marketing websites to be blocked since the first blocking request in November 2019, and more than 230 unlicensed gambling services had left the Australian market since enforcement was strengthened in 2017. The most recent round we have a record of, reported in June 2026, asked ISPs to block another 12 names: 7Signs, ChromaBet, Donbet, Duospin, Freshbet, Slots Gem, Jacks Club, Lucky Start, Pointsbetz, Spinrise, Vinyl Casino and Wildsino. The blocking rate — sites blocked over years elapsed since the first blocking request — works out to roughly 268 sites a year as an average across the period from November 2019 to the June 2026 tally, with the volume clearly accelerating in the most recent reporting rounds. That arithmetic belongs to the writer’s read of the public record and is a band, not a fixed clock; the regulator publishes rounds, not monthly figures, and the rate drifts with each new round.
According to the 2025 report from the analytics firm H2 Gambling Capital, Australian losses to illegal gambling sites were about A$3.9 billion a year, and the share of gambling going through legal channels was 64% — down from 74% in 2021. A reader doing the rough subtraction lands on a number well above A$1 billion a year going to offshore channels; the firm’s figures are the source, and the gap is what those figures say.
The BetStop Question
BetStop is a free Australian Government initiative that lets a person block themselves from all licensed Australian online and phone gambling providers. Registering takes about five minutes and can be done at any time. Once a person registers, licensed providers may not let them place a bet, may not let them open new betting accounts and may not send them marketing messages. A registrant can nominate someone they know to support them while they are self-excluded. None of that binds an offshore casino, because no offshore casino is a licensed Australian provider. BetStop’s reach is defined by the licences it covers.
BetStop launched on 21 August 2023 and is administered by the ACMA. As of 31 July 2026, the register had 67,480 total registrations three years after launch, with 41,290 active exclusions; 78% of registrants are under 40 and 38% chose lifetime exclusion. The exclusion periods on offer are three months, six months, twelve months and lifetime. The minimum is three months. A registrant can extend an active exclusion but cannot shorten it, and a lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed.
How Offshore Sites Find Australians
The mechanics the ACMA acts against are ordinary ones. A site licensed in Curaçao, Cyprus or elsewhere operates on its home rules, accepts deposits in Australian dollars, takes payment by card or by crypto and runs affiliate marketing that finds Australians through search. The site’s terms usually restrict access from certain countries; the restrictions are not always enforced. A site offering an Australian player a deposit bonus and a withdrawal path is offering a service that the IGA says should not be offered at all.
A reader who arrives at one of these sites through a search engine arrives at a site that the regulator has already asked ISPs to block or has already warned. The site works because the block is patchy — Australian ISPs block what the ACMA asks them to block, but a reader can often still reach the site through a path the block has not reached. The path is the gap, not the absence of the law.
What the Player Loses by Leaving the Australian Frame
The legal frame is one thing. The practical frame is another. An offshore site gives no Australian consumer protection, no Australian complaints body and no Australian recourse if a withdrawal is refused or a bonus term is read in a way the player did not expect. The site can be added to a future blocking round with a balance still on it. The player cannot escalate to an Australian regulator and expect an Australian outcome. None of that is theoretical: the ACMA’s blocking figures show how often the regulator’s view catches up with a site’s existence, and the blocking happens to the player as much as to the site.
A site asking an Australian for a credit card or a crypto deposit is operating outside the Australian rules. The credit card ban on licensed online wagering took effect on 11 June 2024, with penalties of up to $247,500 for operators; the same logic extends to digital wallets linked to credit. An offshore site asking for either is asking for something the licensed market has been told not to take.
What “Casino Not on BetStop” Actually Means
It means the site is not licensed in Australia, and therefore not covered by BetStop. It does not mean the site is legal in Australia, or that the site is safe to use, or that the site will pay out. It means the site sits outside the register that covers the only Australian-licensed gambling. That distinction is the whole of the matter.
A reader who has self-excluded through BetStop and is now searching for sites outside the register is searching for a way around the register’s reach. The register’s reach is narrow on purpose: it covers Australian-licensed providers because that is the population of providers Australia can regulate. The fact that the register does not reach an offshore site is not a loophole in the register; it is the boundary of what Australia can enforce. The offshore site is not covered because it is not licensed, not because BetStop has gaps.
The same logic cuts the other way for a reader who is curious about offshore casinos and has never used BetStop. The site being outside BetStop is not a feature the site is offering; it is a description of the site’s relationship to Australian law. There is nothing to opt into.
Where to Get Help Instead
The National Gambling Helpline is 1800 858 858 — free, 24/7. Chat support runs through Gambling Help Online. Both are Australian services, paid for by the Australian government and the states and territories. A reader worried about their own gambling, or about someone else’s, gets a better answer from those services than from any list of offshore sites.
BetStop itself is the formal route. The register is free, takes about five minutes and the exclusion periods on offer are three months, six months, twelve months or lifetime. A lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed. A reader who wants a hard line and does not trust their own ability to keep it has the option of a hard line. A reader who wants a soft line has shorter periods.
The support that exists is not just the register. Bank-level gambling blocks work as well. Westpac’s gambling block works at card level and refuses authorisation of transactions registered under the merchant category code “Betting/Casino Gambling” on eligible personal credit and debit cards. ANZ’s gambling transaction block, activated in the ANZ app, blocks gambling transactions made through a digital wallet such as Apple Pay on an eligible card — not just the physical card. Once turned on, removing ANZ’s block requires a 48-hour waiting period; the bank warns that not all gambling transactions will be blocked and some non-gambling transactions might be blocked in error. The Apple Pay angle matters because, by the end of 2025, Apple Pay, Google Pay and Samsung Pay transactions collectively accounted for around 45% of all card payments in Australia by number. A card-level block that misses the wallet leaves a wide door open.
PayID-based transfers show the name of the account holder before the transfer is sent, and the operator of the New Payments Platform warns that being asked to transfer money to a PayID on an illegal gambling site almost certainly means a scam site. The PayID angle is not a block; it is a check, and it is the only one the system offers before the money moves. Osko, the underlying instant transfer service, gets a bank-to-bank transfer to a participating bank in under a minute, 24/7; that speed is what makes the check worth doing.
What This Page Will Not Do
It will not recommend a casino. There is no recommendation to make. The eleven brands in the table above are the brands the ACMA has named in a formal warning; none of them is positioned as a place to play. Anyone reading this list as a list to try is reading it wrong.
It will not offer a way around BetStop. BetStop does not cover offshore sites because BetStop cannot cover offshore sites, and the absence of coverage is not an opening. A reader who has self-excluded and is looking for a route back is a reader the support services above are set up for.
It will not print a bonus code or a promotion. The only sources for those are the brands themselves and affiliate marketing pages; the ACMA file is not one of them. A bonus number printed here would be either invented or taken from the marketing of a site the regulator has warned against. Neither is useful.
What the Record Actually Shows
The ACMA has been at this for years. The first blocking request went out in November 2019. By June 2026, 1,751 sites and affiliate marketing pages had been blocked, more than 230 unlicensed services had left the Australian market and fresh warnings were still being issued in 2026. The blocking rate, averaged over the years since the first request, runs at roughly 268 sites a year as a band — the regulator publishes in rounds, not monthly figures, and the rate drifts with each round. The record is not a closing file.
The losses side matches. The legal share of gambling fell from 74% in 2021 to 64% in the most recent H2 Gambling Capital reading, with illegal offshore sites absorbing about A$3.9 billion a year. A market that size attracts new entrants even as old ones are blocked. The regulator’s work is ongoing.
BetStop’s own record is three years and roughly 67,000 registrations. Most of those registrants are under 40. The lifetime exclusion option has been chosen by 38% of them. That is the population of Australians who have decided they want a hard line, and the register exists to hold it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is BetStop and how does it differ from a casino ban?
BetStop is the National Self-Exclusion Register — a free Australian Government service that lets a person block themselves from every licensed Australian online and phone wagering provider at once. A casino ban, in the ordinary sense, is what a single operator does when it closes a player’s account; BetStop is one decision that covers the whole licensed market. Both can be undone only on the operator’s or the regulator’s terms, and BetStop’s lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed.
Does BetStop block offshore online casinos as well as licensed wagering sites?
No. BetStop’s reach is defined by licence: it covers “licensed Australian online and phone gambling providers”. An offshore casino is not a licensed Australian provider, so the register does not reach it. The register’s reach is the licensed market; an offshore site sits outside that market by definition.
How long does it take to register with BetStop?
About five minutes, according to BetStop itself. The application can be made at any time through the betstop.gov.au site. Once registered, the exclusion is active immediately across every Australian-licensed online and phone wagering provider, and the exclusion periods on offer are three months, six months, twelve months or lifetime.
Can someone remove themselves from BetStop before the minimum period ends?
No. A registrant can extend an active exclusion but cannot shorten it. The minimum period is three months. A lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed at all. The choice of period is meant to be the choice that holds — the register does not present itself as a switch a person can flip back.
Where can someone get support if they are worried about their gambling instead of searching for casinos outside BetStop?
The National Gambling Helpline on 1800 858 858, free and 24/7, with chat through Gambling Help Online. BetStop itself is the formal route for a self-exclusion. Bank-level gambling blocks at Westpac, ANZ and the other majors add a transaction-level barrier. The Australian frame for help is built around these services; an offshore casino is not part of it.
Is it legal for any online casino to operate in Australia, on or off the BetStop register?
No. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 makes it an offence to provide online casino games, online pokies or in-play betting to a person in Australia, and no state or territory issues a licence for those services. BetStop is not the boundary; the IGA is. An offshore casino offering casino games to Australians is offering a prohibited service, whether or not it sits on the register.
Created by the ”Casino Payout Hub” editorial team.
